2009 Uruguayan referendum
You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in Spanish. (November 2022) Click [show] for important translation instructions.
- Machine translation, like DeepL or Google Translate, is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Wikipedia.
- Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article.
- You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary is
Content in this edit is translated from the existing Spanish Wikipedia article at [[:es:Voto en el exterior en Uruguay]]; see its history for attribution.
- You may also add the template
{{Translated|es|Voto en el exterior en Uruguay}}
to the talk page. - For more guidance, see Wikipedia:Translation.
25 October 2009 |
13º) Uruguayan citizens empowered to vote have the right to vote in elections, plebiscites or referendums, from any country where they reside or are, by letter. In addition to that via, the Electoral Court may implement other procedures, provided that it ensures that the vote is exercised with the same guarantees.
|
|
Politics of Uruguay |
---|
Executive
|
Legislative
|
Judiciary |
|
See also |
Uruguay portal |
|
A double referendum was held in Uruguay on 25 October 2009 alongside general elections. Voters voted on two proposals: one to abolish the Law on the Expiration of the Punitive Claims of the State, which had granted amnesty for human rights abuses under the 1973–85 dictatorship during the presidencies of Juan María Bordaberry, Alberto Demicheli, Aparicio Méndez, and Gregorio Álvarez, and one to enable overseas postal voting. Both proposals were rejected by voters, with 52% rejecting the revocation of the amnesty law and 62% rejecting overseas postal voting.[1][2]
Results
Question | For | Against | Total votes | Registered voters | Turnout | Result | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Votes | % | Votes | % | ||||||||||
Revoking the Law on the Expiration of the Punitive Claims of the State | 1,105,768 | 47.98 | 1,198,918 | 52.02 | 2,304,686 | 2,563,250 | 89.91 | Rejected | |||||
Overseas postal voting | 862,454 | 37.42 | 1,442,232 | 62.28 | 2,304,686 | 2,563,250 | 89.91 | Rejected | |||||
Source: Direct Democracy |