Hobby–Rice theorem

Necklace splitting problem

In mathematics, and in particular the necklace splitting problem, the Hobby–Rice theorem is a result that is useful in establishing the existence of certain solutions. It was proved in 1965 by Charles R. Hobby and John R. Rice;[1] a simplified proof was given in 1976 by A. Pinkus.[2]

The theorem

Define a partition of the interval [0,1] as a division of the interval into n + 1 {\displaystyle n+1} subintervals by as an increasing sequence of n {\displaystyle n} numbers:

0 = z 0 < z 1 < < z n < z n + 1 = 1 {\displaystyle 0=z_{0}<\underbrace {z_{1}<\dotsb <z_{n}} <z_{n+1}=1}

Define a signed partition as a partition in which each subinterval i {\displaystyle i} has an associated sign δ i {\displaystyle \delta _{i}} :

δ 1 , , δ k + 1 { + 1 , 1 } {\displaystyle \delta _{1},\dotsc ,\delta _{k+1}\in \left\{+1,-1\right\}}

The Hobby–Rice theorem says that for every n continuously integrable functions:

g 1 , , g n : [ 0 , 1 ] R {\displaystyle g_{1},\dotsc ,g_{n}\colon [0,1]\longrightarrow \mathbb {R} }

there exists a signed partition of [0,1] such that:

i = 1 n + 1 δ i z i 1 z i g j ( z ) d z = 0  for  1 j n . {\displaystyle \sum _{i=1}^{n+1}\delta _{i}\!\int _{z_{i-1}}^{z_{i}}g_{j}(z)\,dz=0{\text{ for }}1\leq j\leq n.}

(in other words: for each of the n functions, its integral over the positive subintervals equals its integral over the negative subintervals).

Application to fair division

The theorem was used by Noga Alon in the context of necklace splitting[3] in 1987.

Suppose the interval [0,1] is a cake. There are n partners and each of the n functions is a value-density function of one partner. We want to divide the cake into two parts such that all partners agree that the parts have the same value. This fair-division challenge is sometimes referred to as the consensus-halving problem.[4] The Hobby–Rice theorem implies that this can be done with n cuts.

References

  1. ^ Hobby, C. R.; Rice, J. R. (1965). "A moment problem in L1 approximation". Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. 16 (4). American Mathematical Society: 665–670. doi:10.2307/2033900. JSTOR 2033900.
  2. ^ Pinkus, Allan (1976). "A simple proof of the Hobby–Rice theorem". Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. 60 (1). American Mathematical Society: 82–84. doi:10.2307/2041117. JSTOR 2041117.
  3. ^ Alon, Noga (1987). "Splitting Necklaces". Advances in Mathematics. 63 (3): 247–253. doi:10.1016/0001-8708(87)90055-7.
  4. ^ F.W. Simmons and F.E. Su (2003). "Consensus-halving via theorems of Borsuk-Ulam and Tucker" (PDF). Mathematical Social Sciences. 45: 15–25. doi:10.1016/S0165-4896(02)00087-2. hdl:10419/94656.


  • v
  • t
  • e