Self-similar process

Self-similar processes are stochastic processes satisfying a mathematically precise version of the self-similarity property. Several related properties have this name, and some are defined here.

A self-similar phenomenon behaves the same when viewed at different degrees of magnification, or different scales on a dimension. Because stochastic processes are random variables with a time and a space component, their self-similarity properties are defined in terms of how a scaling in time relates to a scaling in space.

Distributional self-similarity

A plot of ( 1 / c ) W c t {\displaystyle (1/{\sqrt {c}})W_{ct}} for W {\displaystyle W} a Brownian motion and c decreasing, demonstrating the self-similarity with parameter H = 1 / 2 {\displaystyle H=1/2} .

Definition

A continuous-time stochastic process ( X t ) t 0 {\displaystyle (X_{t})_{t\geq 0}} is called self-similar with parameter H > 0 {\displaystyle H>0} if for all a > 0 {\displaystyle a>0} , the processes ( X a t ) t 0 {\displaystyle (X_{at})_{t\geq 0}} and ( a H X t ) t 0 {\displaystyle (a^{H}X_{t})_{t\geq 0}} have the same law.[1]

Examples

  • The Wiener process (or Brownian motion) is self-similar with H = 1 / 2 {\displaystyle H=1/2} .[2]
  • The fractional Brownian motion is a generalisation of Brownian motion that preserves self-similarity; it can be self-similar for any H ( 0 , 1 ) {\displaystyle H\in (0,1)} .[3]
  • The class of self-similar Lévy processes are called stable processes. They can be self-similar for any H [ 1 / 2 , ) {\displaystyle H\in [1/2,\infty )} .[4]

Second-order self-similarity

Definition

A wide-sense stationary process ( X n ) n 0 {\displaystyle (X_{n})_{n\geq 0}} is called exactly second-order self-similar with parameter H > 0 {\displaystyle H>0} if the following hold:

(i) V a r ( X ( m ) ) = V a r ( X ) m 2 ( H 1 ) {\displaystyle \mathrm {Var} (X^{(m)})=\mathrm {Var} (X)m^{2(H-1)}} , where for each k N 0 {\displaystyle k\in \mathbb {N} _{0}} , X k ( m ) = 1 m i = 1 m X ( k 1 ) m + i , {\displaystyle X_{k}^{(m)}={\frac {1}{m}}\sum _{i=1}^{m}X_{(k-1)m+i},}
(ii) for all m N + {\displaystyle m\in \mathbb {N} ^{+}} , the autocorrelation functions r {\displaystyle r} and r ( m ) {\displaystyle r^{(m)}} of X {\displaystyle X} and X ( m ) {\displaystyle X^{(m)}} are equal.

If instead of (ii), the weaker condition

(iii) r ( m ) r {\displaystyle r^{(m)}\to r} pointwise as m {\displaystyle m\to \infty }

holds, then X {\displaystyle X} is called asymptotically second-order self-similar.[5]

Connection to long-range dependence

In the case 1 / 2 < H < 1 {\displaystyle 1/2<H<1} , asymptotic self-similarity is equivalent to long-range dependence.[1] Self-similar and long-range dependent characteristics in computer networks present a fundamentally different set of problems to people doing analysis and/or design of networks, and many of the previous assumptions upon which systems have been built are no longer valid in the presence of self-similarity.[6]

Long-range dependence is closely connected to the theory of heavy-tailed distributions.[7] A distribution is said to have a heavy tail if

lim x e λ x Pr [ X > x ] = for all  λ > 0. {\displaystyle \lim _{x\to \infty }e^{\lambda x}\Pr[X>x]=\infty \quad {\mbox{for all }}\lambda >0.\,}

One example of a heavy-tailed distribution is the Pareto distribution. Examples of processes that can be described using heavy-tailed distributions include traffic processes, such as packet inter-arrival times and burst lengths.[8]

Examples

  • The Tweedie convergence theorem can be used to explain the origin of the variance to mean power law, 1/f noise and multifractality, features associated with self-similar processes.[9]
  • Ethernet traffic data is often self-similar.[5] Empirical studies of measured traffic traces have led to the wide recognition of self-similarity in network traffic.[8]

References

  1. ^ a b §1.4.1 of Park, Willinger (2000)
  2. ^ Chapter 2: Lemma 9.4 of Ioannis Karatzas; Steven E. Shreve (1991), Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus (second ed.), Springer Verlag, doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0949-2, ISBN 978-0-387-97655-6
  3. ^ Gennady Samorodnitsky; Murad S. Taqqu (1994), "Chapter 7: "Self-similar processes"", Stable Non-Gaussian Random Processes, Chapman & Hall, ISBN 0-412-05171-0
  4. ^ Theorem 3.2 of Andreas E. Kyprianou; Juan Carlos Pardo (2022), Stable Lévy Processes via Lamperti-Type Representations, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/9781108648318, ISBN 978-1-108-48029-1
  5. ^ a b Will E. Leland; Murad S. Taqqu; Walter Willinger; Daniel V. Wilson (February 1994), "On the Self-similar Nature of Ethernet Traffic (Extended Version)", IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 2 (1), IEEE: 1–15, doi:10.1109/90.282603
  6. ^ "The Self-Similarity and Long Range Dependence in Networks Web site". Cs.bu.edu. Archived from the original on 2019-08-22. Retrieved 2012-06-25.
  7. ^ §1.4.2 of Park, Willinger (2000)
  8. ^ a b Park, Willinger (2000)
  9. ^ Kendal, Wayne S.; Jørgensen, Bent (2011-12-27). "Tweedie convergence: A mathematical basis for Taylor's power law, 1/f noise, and multifractality". Physical Review E. 84 (6). American Physical Society (APS): 066120. Bibcode:2011PhRvE..84f6120K. doi:10.1103/physreve.84.066120. ISSN 1539-3755. PMID 22304168.

Sources

  • Kihong Park; Walter Willinger (2000), Self-Similar Network Traffic and Performance Evaluation, New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., doi:10.1002/047120644X, ISBN 0471319740
  • v
  • t
  • e
Discrete timeContinuous timeBothFields and otherTime series modelsFinancial modelsActuarial modelsQueueing modelsPropertiesLimit theoremsInequalitiesToolsDisciplines